energy transfer north dakota

Energy Transfer, Greenpeace outline arguments

Trial begins in $300M lawsuit against Greenpeace over North Dakota pipeline protests

An attorney for a Texas pipeline company says he will show at trial that various Greenpeace entities coordinated delays and disruptions of a controversial oil pipeline’s construction in North Dakota a

Rapid City Journal · 6h

Energy Transfer, Greenpeace outline arguments as $300M trial starts in North Dakota

An attorney representing the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline told a jury of Morton County residents on Wednesday morning that Greenpeace was secretly behind the protests

The Associated Press on MSN · 1d

Texas pipeline company’s $300M lawsuit against Greenpeace heads to trial in North Dakota

Dallas-based Energy Transfer and its subsidiary Dakota Access allege trespass, nuisance, defamation and other offenses by Netherlands-based Greenpeace International and its American branch, Greenpeace USA. The lawsuit also names the group’s funding arm, Greenpeace Fund Inc.

Slate2d

A $300 Million Lawsuit Is Threatening a Storied Activist Group. You Should Be Worried.

In a North Dakota district court, Texas pipeline company Energy Transfer Partners is accusing the international environmental organization Greenpeace of single-handedly organizing a disruptive ...

4don MSN

Greenpeace Says It’s Facing Bankruptcy From Oil Company Lawsuit Over Dakota Pipeline Protests

A Texas-based company claims the environmental advocacy group tried to delay construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline with ...

The New York Times1d

‘Day of Reckoning’: Trial Over Greenpeace’s Role in Pipeline Protest Begins

By Karen Zraick Reporting from the Morton County courthouse in Mandan, N.D. Lawyers for the pipeline company Energy Transfer and Greenpeace fired their opening salvos in a North Dakota ...

Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.

Hide inaccessible results

Energy Transfer, Greenpeace outline arguments

Trending now